Something that continues to periodically come up is the need to remind people running manual staging to ensure they specify both the SSID and the Clone ID when they stage. I did some initial coverage of this when I first started the blog, but I wanted to revisit and demonstrate exactly why this is necessary.

The short version of why is simple: If you stage by SSID alone, NetWorker will delete/purge all instances of the saveset other than the one you just created. This is Not A Good Thing for 99.999% of what we do within NetWorker.

So to demonstrate, here’s a session where I:

  1. Generate a backup
  2. Clone the backup to tape
  3. Stage the saveset only to tape

In between each step, I’ll run mminfo to get a dump of what the media database says about saveset availability.

Part 1 – Generate the Backup

Here’s a very simple backup for the purposes of this demonstration, and the subsequent mminfo command to find out about the backup:

[root@tara ~]# save -b Default -LL -q /etc
save: /etc  106 MB 00:00:07   2122 files
completed savetime=1258093549

[root@tara ~]# mminfo -q "client=tara.pmdg.lab,name=/etc" -r volume,ssid,cloneid,
savetime
 volume        ssid          clone id  date
Default.001    2600270829  1258093549 11/13/2009
Default.001.RO 2600270829  1258093548 11/13/2009

There’s nothing out of the ordinary here, so we’ll move onto the next step.

Part 2 – Clone the Backup

We’ll just do a manual clone to the Default Clone pool. Here we’ll specify the saveset ID alone, which is fine for cloning – but is often what leads people to being in the habit of not specifying a particular saveset instance. I’m using very small VTL tapes, so don’t be worried that in this case I’ve got a clone of /etc spanning 3 volumes:

[root@tara ~]# nsrclone -b "Default Clone" -S 2600270829
[root@tara ~]# mminfo -q "client=tara.pmdg.lab,name=/etc" -r volume,ssid,cloneid,
savetime
 volume        ssid          clone id  date
800843S3       2600270829  1258094164 11/13/2009
800844S3       2600270829  1258094164 11/13/2009
800845S3       2600270829  1258094164 11/13/2009
Default.001    2600270829  1258093549 11/13/2009
Default.001.RO 2600270829  1258093548 11/13/2009

As you can see there, it’s all looking fairly ordinary at this point – nothing surprising is going on at all.

Part 3 – Stage by Saveset ID Only

In this next step, I’m going to stage by saveset ID alone rather than specifying the saveset ID/clone ID, which is the correct way of staging, so as to demonstrate what happens at the conclusion of the staging. I’ll be staging to a pool called “Big”:

[root@tara ~]# nsrstage -b Big -v -m -S 2600270829
Obtaining media database information on server tara.pmdg.lab
Parsing save set id(s)
Migrating the following save sets (ids):
 2600270829
5874:nsrstage: Automatically copying save sets(s) to other volume(s)

Starting migration operation...
Nov 13 17:34:00 tara logger: NetWorker media: (waiting) Waiting for 1 writable
volume(s) to backup pool 'Big' disk(s) or tape(s) on tara.pmdg.lab
5884:nsrstage: Successfully cloned all requested save sets
5886:nsrstage: Clones were written to the following volume(s):
 BIG991S3
6359:nsrstage: Deleting the successfully cloned save set 2600270829
Successfully deleted original clone 1258093548 of save set 2600270829
from media database.
Successfully deleted AFTD's companion clone 1258093549 of save set 2600270829
from media database with 0 retries.
Successfully deleted original clone 1258094164 of save set 2600270829
from media database.
Recovering space from volume 4294740163 failed with the error
'Cannot access volume 800844S3, please mount the volume or verify its label.'.
Refer to the NetWorker log for details.
6330:nsrstage: Cannot access volume 800844S3, please mount the volume
or verify its label.
Completed recover space operation for volume 4177299774
Refer to the NetWorker log for any failures.
Recovering space from volume 4277962971 failed with the error
'Cannot access volume 800845S3, please mount the volume or verify its label.'.
Refer to the NetWorker log for details.
6330:nsrstage: Cannot access volume 800845S3, please mount the volume
or verify its label.
Recovering space from volume 16550059 failed with the error
'Cannot access volume 800843S3, please mount the volume or verify its label.'.
Refer to the NetWorker log for details.
6330:nsrstage: Cannot access volume 800843S3, please mount the volume
or verify its label.

You’ll note there’s a bunch of output there about being unable to access the clone volumes the saveset was previously cloned to. When we then check mminfo, we see the consequences of the staging operation though:

[root@tara ~]# mminfo -q "client=tara.pmdg.lab,name=/etc" -r volume,ssid,cloneid,
savetime
 volume        ssid          clone id  date
BIG991S3       2600270829  1258095244 11/13/2009

As you can see – no reference to the clone volumes at all!

Now, has the clone data been erased? No, but it has been removed from the media database, meaning you’d have to manually scan the volumes back in order to be able to use them again. Worse, if those volumes only contained clone data that was subsequently removed from the media database, they may become eligible for recycling and get re-used before you notice what has gone wrong!

Wrapping Up

Hopefully the above session will have demonstrated the danger of staging by saveset ID alone. If instead of staging by saveset ID we staged by saveset ID and clone ID, we’d have had a much more desirable outcome. Here’s a (short) example of that:

[root@tara ~]# save -b Default -LL -q /tmp
save: /tmp  2352 KB 00:00:01     67 files
completed savetime=1258094378
[root@tara ~]# mminfo -q "name=/tmp" -r volume,ssid,cloneid
 volume        ssid          clone id
Default.001    2583494442  1258094378
Default.001.RO 2583494442  1258094377
[root@tara ~]# nsrclone -b "Default Clone" -S 2583494442

[root@tara ~]# mminfo -q "name=/tmp" -r volume,ssid,cloneid
 volume        ssid          clone id
800845S3       2583494442  1258095244
Default.001    2583494442  1258094378
Default.001.RO 2583494442  1258094377
[root@tara ~]# nsrstage -b Big -v -m -S 2583494442/1258094377
Obtaining media database information on server tara.pmdg.lab
Parsing save set id(s)
Migrating the following save sets (ids):
 2583494442
5874:nsrstage: Automatically copying save sets(s) to other volume(s)

Starting migration operation...

5886:nsrstage: Clones were written to the following volume(s):
 BIG991S3
6359:nsrstage: Deleting the successfully cloned save set 2583494442
Successfully deleted original clone 1258094377 of save set 2583494442 from
media database.
Successfully deleted AFTD's companion clone 1258094378 of save set 2583494442
from media database with 0 retries.
Completed recover space operation for volume 4177299774
Refer to the NetWorker log for any failures.

[root@tara ~]# mminfo -q "name=/tmp" -r volume,ssid,cloneid
 volume        ssid          clone id
800845S3       2583494442  1258095244
BIG991S3       2583494442  1258096324

The recommendation that I always make is that you forget about using saveset IDs alone unless you absolutely have to. Instead, get yourself into the habit of always specifying a particular instance of a saveset ID via the “ssid/cloneid” option. That way, if you do any manual staging, you won’t wipe out access to data!

 

I’ve been using Parallels Desktop for the Mac for several years now – in fact, when I originally started using it, VMware were only talking about doing a desktop virtualisation product for the Mac.

That’s partly why I stay loyal to Parallels – they supported the platform sooner. The other reason is that after years of hearing tripe from VMware employees about why you couldn’t mix windows from both operating systems, Parallels went ahead and did it with Coherence. (Yes, VMware Fusion’s Unity functionality went there too, around the same time, but the amount of times I heard it wasn’t a feature they were interested in within Workstation, as an example, drove me nuts.)

So when Parallels Desktop v5 for the Mac came out, I jumped on the upgrade bandwagon. It’s given me one major positive – I can now run Solaris 10 AMD 64-bit on my Mac Pro; that was the one remaining OS I absolutely need to periodically run that I was being blocked from doing previously. After about 3 days of installing, reinstalling, downloading more recent versions of Solaris 10 AMD, I even finally managed to get networking operational within the VM too, which meant it was useful.

Other than that, Parallels v5 has been a bit of a disappointment. You see, currently for me, Coherence mode only works if I’ve got a single monitor attached to my machine. The only time that happens is when I’m using my laptop away from my desk, or when I’m traveling – and those are times I’m less likely to run VMs. Since Coherence doesn’t work for me 99% of the time, that means I can’t really try out the Crystal mode – though I’ll admit, I’m unlikely to use it heavily; I dislike the “shared apps” approach offered by Parallels, and the new Crystal view mode seems to rely heavily on this.

It does continue to annoy me that I don’t have the option of virtually turning the monitor off – why can’t I close the console for a running VM? Surely that’s not so huge a thing that it can only be limited to enterprise class virtualisation – aka ESX, VMware Server or Parallels Server. When you have 10+ VMs running at once, even minimised all those consoles start to get annoying.

While overall I’m pretty happy with Parallels performance in terms of memory and CPU, recent support cases have highlighted to me that when it comes to translated IO, Parallels struggles – it seems to peak at about 20MB/s per VM, regardless of the throughput capabilities of the attached device. I first noticed that under v4, and was unhappy to see no change in v5.

If you’re currently a Parallels Desktop for Mac user, and you haven’t yet upgraded, I’d suggest holding off until the next build of v5, rather than jumping into the initial build released. Hopefully by then they’ll at least have Coherence reliably working again.

[Edit, 2009-11-14]

I’d like to take back my comments about Parallels 5 still having mediocre IO performance. I just realised, a short while ago, that one of the VMs I’d been testing with had failed in its VMware Tools update. Now, with both VMs in this particular test config updated to Parallels Tools v5, instead of getting 14-17MB/s transfer speed between them as I’d been getting under Paralles v4, I’m now getting 45-57MB/s. Now that’s a performance improvement.

© 2012 The NetWorker Blog Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha