<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mac OS X Snow Leopard and NetWorker, redux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nsrd.info/blog/2010/03/11/snow-leopard-networker-redux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nsrd.info/blog/2010/03/11/snow-leopard-networker-redux/</link>
	<description>EMC NetWorker commentary from a long term backup consultant and theorist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 21:45:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston de Guise</title>
		<link>http://nsrd.info/blog/2010/03/11/snow-leopard-networker-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-847</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston de Guise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nsrd.info/blog/?p=1988#comment-847</guid>
		<description>The main issue is the number of changes in 10.6. I think the core optimisation of 32-&gt;64-bit in 10.6 has rendered some library access by NetWorker a bit flakey. I also want to do more tests relating to recovery of HFS+ compressed files, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main issue is the number of changes in 10.6. I think the core optimisation of 32-&gt;64-bit in 10.6 has rendered some library access by NetWorker a bit flakey. I also want to do more tests relating to recovery of HFS+ compressed files, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Takeo</title>
		<link>http://nsrd.info/blog/2010/03/11/snow-leopard-networker-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-846</link>
		<dc:creator>Takeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nsrd.info/blog/?p=1988#comment-846</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting about the issue and the update! Hoping to see this resolved very soon as most of our servers are on 10.6 since its release.  

I find that 7.4.4 is more reliable than 7.5.1 in most situations - 7.4.4 will still require a restart/reinstall eventually however for the backups to run successfully. Previously with 10.4 and 10.5, 7.4.4 ran fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting about the issue and the update! Hoping to see this resolved very soon as most of our servers are on 10.6 since its release.  </p>
<p>I find that 7.4.4 is more reliable than 7.5.1 in most situations &#8211; 7.4.4 will still require a restart/reinstall eventually however for the backups to run successfully. Previously with 10.4 and 10.5, 7.4.4 ran fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic

Served from: nsrd.info @ 2012-05-24 01:12:58 -->
